Carl is stopped on the street, handcuffed, and then taken back to a waiting patrol car. The officer shoves Carl’s face against the glass window and asks the person in the back seat, “Is this the man who attacked you?” The witness says yes and Carl is arrested. Is this identification admissible at trial?
a. Yes, because Carl was validly arrested.
b. Yes, because the witness identified Carl.
c. No, because Carl was not read his Miranda rights.
d. No, because it was an impermissible “show-up.”
d. No, because it was an impermissible “show-up.”
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is true of peremptory challenges?
a. No reason needs to be given to exclude a juror b. A reason needs to be given to exclude a juror c. Those that are based on racial criteria or gender are illegal d. Peremptory challenges are unlimited e. No reason needs to be given to exclude a juror and those that are based on racial criteria or gender are illegal
Which of the following would not need to be authenticated by testimony??
A. An autopsy report? B. A report issued by the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)? C. A document with a notary public's seal? D. ?A report issued by the federal EPA and a document with a notary public's seal
The U.S. Congress is a bicameral legislature
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
A(n) ________ is not automatic, and the borrower has the opportunity to seek other remedies to avoid foreclosure
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word