Explain and summarize the federal penalties for drug trafficking
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: Drug penalties at the federal level come from the Controlled Substances Act. They separate the penalties into two categories: simple possession and trafficking. First-time offenders for simple possession face a maximum of one year imprisonment and a fine of between $1,000 and $5,000. Second-time offenders face a maximum of two years and a fine of up to $10,000. Trafficking is based on the Schedule and amount of the drug combined with whether the offense is a first offense, second offense, or more offenses. Students should gather their information regarding specific penalties from Table 8.1. There are also a number of special circumstances in regard to the penalty imposed. Examples of these include: Penalties are doubled for first-offense trafficking of Schedule I or II controlled substances if death or bodily injury results from the use of such substances. Penalties for the sale of drugs by a person over 21 years of age to someone under the age of 18 are increased to up to double those imposed for sale to an adult. Penalties for the sale of drugs within 1,000 feet of an elementary or secondary school are increased to up to double those imposed when the sale is made elsewhere. Fines for companies or business associations are generally 2.5 times greater than for individuals. In either case, penalties
include the forfeiture of cars, boats, or planes that have been used in the illegal conveyance of controlled substances
You might also like to view...
The mode is the only measure of central tendency that is appropriate for nominal-level data
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The interest of the public in bail is to
A. Prevent the intimidation of witnesses B. Improve the exchange of information between defense counsel and client C. Allow defendants to maintain employment D. Allow innocent defendants to assist in investigating their cases
Unfortunately, since the CompStat process was introduced by the New York City Police Department in 1994, it has been adopted by only a few agencies
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
In Blakely v. Washington the U.S. Supreme Court:
a. in essence upheld Washington State's sentencing guideline scheme. b. upheld the defendant's sentence, stating it complied with the ruling set forth in Apprendi v. New Jersey. c. in essence, struck down Washington State's sentencing guideline scheme. d. held that Washington State's sentencing guideline scheme was not implicated under the facts of this case inthat it dealt only with a maximum not a minimum sentence.