There they go again, all those know-nothing would-be censors who don't want the rest of
us to see anything but Disney cartoons.
What will be an ideal response?
Now they're taking on the Internet, the last
bastion of free speech. And once again, they're hiding behind the innocent little children,
just like they always do. They ban marijuana, and they say it's for the children. The
want to ban tobacco, and they say it's for the children. Well, if they really cared for the
children they'd be rescuing homeless children out on the streets or in shelters.
You might also like to view...
How are ontological arguments for the existence of God different from cosmological arguments?
A. There are no significant differences between the two. B. ontological arguments are based on analogy whereas cosmological arguments are based on observation. C. ontological arguments are based on reason whereas cosmological arguments are based on observation. D. ontological arguments are based on facts whereas cosmological arguments are based on opinion.
Mahayana philosophy was extremely sensitive to the problem of __________
a. monophysitism b. duality c. nirvana d. cyclic existence
The conclusion of a sound argument
What will be an ideal response?
If I understood all things in the world and were not in charity, what would that help me in the sight of God, who will judge me according to my deeds? (Thomas á Kempis, The Imitation of Christ)This statement exemplifies a(n) ________.
A. argument B. illustration C. conditional statement D. unsupported assertion E. explanation