Discuss why Kant and Aristotle would argue over the notion of who is a virtuous person
A. For Aristotle, a person is virtuous if they act virtuously because they want to.For Kant, a person is virtuous if they act virtuously to help others because they should regardless of how they feel about taking such actions
B. For Aristotle, a person is virtuous if they act virtuously to help others because they should regardless of how they feel about taking such actions. For Kant, a person is virtuous if they act virtuously because they want to.
C. For Aristotle, a person is virtuous if they find it easy to act virtuously and
acting this way makes them look good. For Kant, a person is virtuous if they
act virtuously but against their own desires.
D. For Aristotle, a person is virtuous if they act virtuously even if they don't want
to. For Kant, a person is virtuous if the person does good works.
A
You might also like to view...
Describe the roles of the river Ganges in Hindu practice.
What will be an ideal response?
Which of the following is not one of the criteria by which writings were judged for inclusion in the New Testament?
a. apostolic authorship or authority b. doctrinal content c. actual usage in prominent Christian churches. d. Pauline blessing
Syllogism 2H Given the following syllogism: No happy marriages are planned arrangements, so some unplanned arrangements are fulfilling relationships, because some unhappy marriages are not unfulfilling relationships. After reducing the number of terms in Syllogism 2H, the conclusion is:
A) No happy marriages are planned arrangements. B) Some fulfilling relationships are not happy marriages. C) Some happy marriages are not fulfilling relationships. D) Some planned arrangements are not fulfilling relationships. E) Some fulfilling relationships are not planned arrangements.
"Canaan" refers to
A. an early name for the region of Israel. B. the name of the sacred book of the Babylonians. C. an Egyptian goddess. D. a son of Noah.