Should judges be permitted to make decisions based on extralegal factors? If so, what kinds of factors should they consider? If not, why not?
What will be an ideal response?
Making decisions based solely on the laws would be extremely hard to do. Judges should remain impartial, but judges' decisions can sometimes be influenced by personal ideology, election considerations, pubic opinions, strategic considerations, and consensus-seeking.
Judges should limit decisions to actual controversies, have limits on ability to answer political questions, not have the ability to rule on the wisdom of legislation, and only have the ability to overturn laws they must be on the narrowest grounds.
You might also like to view...
Jeopardizing the security, integrity, confidentiality, or availability of an information system or network or any information stored on, processed on, or transiting such a system is also referred to as a ______.
a. cyberincident b. cybercall c. cyberwarfare d. cybercheck
Guiding human potential and action in a moral direction is the subject matter of _________.
A. Ethics.
B. Law.
C. Etiquette.
D. Values.
E. None of the above.
Most juvenile laws provide broad authority for the police to take juveniles into custody, such statutes are designed to give the police the authority to act ______________________________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
A(n) _________ is an individualized, written document that clarifies how each court-ordered condition is to be fulfilled by the offender and the supervising officer in the context of the risks and needs posed
a. collateral contact b. case plan c. PSI d. LSI-R