"If someone is terminally ill, then there is no hope that the person's condition will be getting better but only worse" is
A) an argument? B) an explanation C) a conditional
C
You might also like to view...
The Golden Temple of Amritsar is in
a. India c. Iraq b. Pakistan d. Germany
INSTRUCTIONS: In each problem below you are given a statement, its truth value in parentheses, and a new statement. You must determine how the new statement is related to the given statement and determine the truth value of the new statement. Adopt the Aristotelian standpoint and assume that 'A' and 'B' denote things that actually exist. Some non-A are non-B. (F) Some B are A
A) Conversion. (F) B) Contraposition. (F) C) Conversion. (Und.) D) Subcontrary. (T) E) Contraposition. (Und.)
Do you find Mill's harm principle attractive or problematic? Explain why. Discuss the application of the harm principle to one of the following issues: drug legalization, gun control, or helmet laws.
What will be an ideal response?
A) Provide an informal analysis of the following passage; orB) in analyzing the passage, do the following:a. Identify the causal hypothesis at issue.b. Identify what kind of study it is.c. Describe the control and experimental groups.d. State the difference in effect (or cause) between control and experimental groups.e. Identify any problems in either the study or the report of it, including but not necessarily limited to uncontrolled variables.f. State the conclusion you think is warranted by the report.In 1960, Dutch researchers from the University of Leiden questioned 852 men and their wives about the men's diets and then monitored the men for the next twenty years. They found that the death rate from heart disease was more than 50 percent lower among men who ate at least thirty grams
(one ounce) of fish per day compared with men who ate no fish. Just one or two fish dishes a week, the researchers say, "may be of value in the prevention of coronary heart disease."-Adapted from Science News What will be an ideal response?