Identify the principle of the preemption doctrine and discuss implications for state prosecution of crimes in the workplace. What specific actions have states taken against environmental and workplace safety violators?
What will be an ideal response?
The preemption doctrine invalidates state laws that interfere with or are contrary to federal law. The flaw in applying the preemption doctrine to crimes in the workplace is that preemption would require states to afford less protection to employees. States have begun to pursue criminal cases against environmental wrongdoers. This can be justified on the traditional criminal justice punishment goals of deterrence and retribution.
You might also like to view...
According to predictions made by Georgette Bennett, cities in the future will
a. become safer. b. become more dangerous. c. have relatively stable crime rates. d. Bennett did not make any predictions about cities
President Johnson established what commission?
a. The Johnson Commission b. The Wickersham Commission c. The Omnibus Crime Control Commission d. The President's Crime Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice
During the Gerald Gault hearing, Mrs. Cook, the victim, gave very damaging testimony.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Does the Supreme Court allow the execution of mentally impaired inmates? Explain
What will be an ideal response?