Compare the use of biosensors with traditional methods of determining microbial contamination
What will be an ideal response?
Traditional methods of detecting microbial contaminants rely on collecting samples containing living microbes and being able to culture them in the laboratory. The need to provide the right growth conditions reduces the sensitivity of such tests. Waiting for the organisms to grow makes traditional methods time consuming.
Biosensors use bacteria or bacterial enzymes to detect small amounts of contaminants in samples. The results are available in minutes rather than hours or days. Detection does not rely on properly anticipating an organism's growth requirements. Biosensors can also be designed to distinguish between closely related organisms, for example, by detecting whether a toxin is present in the sample. Biosensors are faster and more sensitive than traditional methods, and they are potentially more effective in distinguishing truly harmful microbes from their harmless close relatives.
You might also like to view...
Infecting people with ________ led to vaccination against smallpox.
A) chickenpox virus B) swine flu virus C) cowpox D) measles virus
The two strands of DNA in a DNA double helix
a. are identical to each other. b. are connected to each other by covalent chemical bonds. c. both contain nucleotides, but the order of the nucleotides on the two strands is not related. d. are oriented in the same direction. e. are antiparallel to each other.
A(n) ____ is an observed consequence of global climate change
a. more earthquakes b. acid rain c. increase in the ozone hole d. decrease in the ozone layer e. rise in sea level
Decompression sickness is caused by
a. a rapid rise of carbon dioxide in the blood. b. lack of oxygen in the tissues. c. bubbles of nitrogen in the blood. d. a rapid decrease in blood pH. e. descending too rapidly into deep water.