Summarize and discuss the case People v. Kellogg. Compare and contrast this case with Robinson v. California and Powell v. Texas. What were the rulings in each of these cases? Do you agree with the ruling? Why or why not?
What will be an ideal response?
People v. Kellogg deals with the issue of status offense and whether the defendant was being unjustly punished for his status as a homeless alcoholic. The court ruled that the defendant was not being punished for his status, rather, his voluntary act (similar to Powell v. Texas). Robinson v. California held that it is unjust to punish a person because of his or her mere condition. The court argued that it is possible to be drunk in public and not pose a threat to the safety of everyone else. Kellogg, on the other hand, posed a safety issue and was held guilty for his behavior rather than his status.
You might also like to view...
__________ differences among countries create the biggest problem in reporting crime
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Federal judges have lifetime appointments and therefore cannot be impeached for judicial misconduct.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Two-population tests for differences between proportions ______.
A. make use of either the t distribution or the z distribution, depending upon the critical value and df B. use only the t distribution C. use only the z distribution D. use the t distribution if the N > 100 or the z distribution if N < 99
A variety of suicide prevention measures for officers exist, including supervisor training.
a. true b. false