Summarize the Supreme Court's decisions in Tennessee v. Garner and Graham v. Connor. Why are these decisions important to criminal procedure?
What will be an ideal response?
The Garner decision declared unconstitutional a Tennessee statute that authorized police officers who give notice of the intent to arrest to "use all the necessary means to effect the arrest" if the suspect flees or resists.
Four years after Garner, the Supreme Court decided the landmark case of Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), which set the standard for nondeadly force. The Court declared emphatically that all claims involving allegations of excessive force against police officers must be analyzed under the Fourth Amendment's reasonableness requirement. Further, the Court adopted a test of objective reasonableness to decide when excessive force is used. This requires focusing on what a reasonable police officer would do "without regard to [the officer's] underlying intent or motivation."
You might also like to view...
Briefly describe the relationship between terrorism and common crime.
What will be an ideal response?
Rape ___ laws prohibit questioning of a rape victim if the purpose of the questions is to expose the victim's previous sexual history
What will be an ideal response?
Ralf Dahrendorf argued that modern society is organized into a plurality of competing __________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Which of the following is NOT one of Peel's policing principles?
a. The police must be stable, efficient, and organized along military lines. b. The absence of crime will best prove the efficience of the police. c. The distribution of crime news is essential. d. The police must rely heavily on community input.