Which of the following are ways to challenge or attack a legal position or argument based on a court opinion?
A. The opinion is not on point because of key fact differences
B. Reliance on the opinion is misplaced because the principle applied does not apply to the case at hand
C. The court opinion is not subject to a different interpretation
D. The court opinion is universally followed
E. All of the above
F. a and b
G. a, b, and d
Answer: F
You might also like to view...
Colin has just been hired in a family law practice. His job description indicates that he will be assigned to work on drafting separation agreements. He would be well advised to do all BUT which one of the following?
A) Discuss the specifics of each agreement he is assigned to draft with other paralegals in the office because they may have experience drafting agreements involving similar fact patterns. B) Review the laws (case and statutory), rules, and procedures governing the content and format of separation agreements in his or her jurisdiction. C) Examine "model agreements" available in firm files, form books, and state practice manuals. D) Examine previously drafted agreements in closed divorce files for cases that presented similar fact patterns.
A tenant’s right to the leased premises is subject to all the landlord’s title defects.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Incriminating evidence in documents can generally be compelled if
A. it is contained in federal income tax reports B. it is contained in a letter that goes through a U.S. post office C. it is subject to a statute that specifically requires the reporting of criminal activity D. the right against self-incrimination is asserted before the record is kept
What is a Jukebox?
What will be an ideal response?