In Hanks v. McNeil Coal Corporation (the father sold property to a coal company, and the son, conservator of the father's estate, was trying to invalidate the sale), the court held that?
A. ?the contract could be voided because the son, as conservator of the father's estate, had proved his father was insane at the time of the contract.
B. the real property sale was voidable because the sale was directly connected with the horse medicine business.
C. ?the contract was void because the father had been adjudicated insane prior to signing the contract.
D. ?the son had failed to prove the father's mental problem affected his conduct with regard to the contract.
Answer: D
You might also like to view...
Freedom of assembly is a defense unless the gathering presents a clear and present danger.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Mediating a dispute may not result in a resolution of a dispute.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Mary Carter and Gallagher agreements promote settlement but are also potentially abusive to non-agreeing defendants.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
In a predictive memorandum, in lieu of a thesis paragraph you often see:
A) point headings B) statement of facts C) conclusion D) brief answer