Discuss the five-paragraph SMEAC that should ideally find a place in any investigation plan
What will be an ideal response?
• Situation: Define the "who" and "what" of the investigation.
• Mission: Define the optimal case scenario. What do investigators want to happen?
• Execution: Explain how the mission will be accomplished.
• Avenues of approach and escape: How will investigators enter and exit the scene?
• Communications: How will investigators communicate at the scene? Who is the primary point of contact?
You might also like to view...
In this textbook, the term _____ is used when discussing developmental research and the term _____ is used for the youth who has been adjudicated as such by the courts
a) delinquent; juvenile delinquent b) antisocial behavior; delinquent c) delinquency; delinquent d) juvenile delinquency; antisocial delinquent
It is well known that there is generally a tolerance zone for speeding infractions
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
A very large variation ratio would be indicative of which of the following circumstances?
A. a vast majority of the cases in the modal category B. a vast majority of the cases outside the modal category C. a vast majority of cases having a standard deviation of ?1.00 D. a vast majority of cases having a small variance
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. If the F test leads us to reject the null hypothesis, we must then conclude that the two population standard deviations are the same. 2. A researcher wishing to compare the values of parents and children collects data from 10 children and their parents. The t test for dependent means would be the appropriate statistical analysis. 3. A researcher wishing to compare the values of parents and children collects data from 10 children and their parents. The t test for dependent means would be the appropriate statistical analysis. 4. When testing for a difference between proportions, a researcher would use the z statistic instead of the t statistic. 5. At the end of a study, girls (N = 100) increased their reading score by 38% while boys (N = 200) increased it by 51%. Based on these findings, the researcher can accept the null hypothesis that there is not a difference between the two groups.