Why did classical theory come under fire from the positivistic school of criminological thought?
What will be an ideal response?
Possible answer: Quite simply, the positivistic school did not think the classical school was scientific enough. The free will nature of ‘choosing crime' seemed to align more with a philosophical approach to a fair and responsive justice system rather than a solid explanation of what causes crime. Thus, to many in the positivism movement, classical theories tended to be quasi-scientific in that it began to explore a scientific approach to explain crime, but was not as rigorous as the explanations coming out of the positivist thinkers. For example, the internal processing of ‘rational choice' decision-making tended to be identified with the soul, which is unobservable and unscientific. While modern criminologists have used indirect ways to measure the rational decision-making of individuals in certain contexts, this concept is still hard to measure with precision to this very day.
You might also like to view...
The first published national crime report was published by which of the following groups?
a. FBI b. International Association of Police c. Department of Justice d. The National Crime Center
Explain the historical foundation of men dominating women
What will be an ideal response?
At the arraignment, the three options for a plea are guilty, not guilty, and ______.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Incarceration of an individual convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol is an example of:
A) general deterrence. B) ?specific deterrence. C) ?situational prevention. D) ?just desserts. E) ?targeted deterrence.