If you are trying to prove that A causes B, why does it make sense to have your null hypothesis be "A does not cause B"?
A. We must allow for B to cause A.
B. It is easier to make strong inductive arguments when rejecting a hypothesis.
C. Data cannot confirm a hypothesis and it is easier to make strong inductive arguments when rejecting a hypothesis.
D. Data cannot confirm a hypothesis.
Answer: C
You might also like to view...
What characteristic of a cellular blastoderm in Drosophila embryogenesis distinguishes it from the syncytial blastoderm?
What will be an ideal response?
Which of the following translocations is associated with chronic myelogenous leukemia?
A. t(8;14) B. t(14;18) C. t(11;14) D. t(9;22) E. t(15;17)
Groups of cells with a common function make up a/an:
A) tissue. B) limb. C) gland. D) organ system. E) organ.
Microorganisms are at their most uniform in terms of chemical and physiological properties during ________ phase.
A. stationary B. lag C. exponential D. decline