Discuss two reasons why the exclusionary rule may not deter police misconduct. Give an example of each
What will be an ideal response?
Two reasons why the exclusionary rule may not deter police misconduct are (1)
since a great majority of criminal cases result in plea bargain, the exclusionary rule is
not invoked and (2) the officer may truly believe his actions are valid. For example,
most driving while intoxicated misdemeanor cases are plea bargained, thus the
exclusionary rule is not invoked to enforce a defendant's constitutional rights in such
cases. Officers may believe they have acted correctly, but they are not aware of a
recent case that makes their actions improper.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is NOT one of the components of community-oriented policing?
A. Police-community reciprocity B. Centralization of police units C. Civilianization of the police force D. Proactive policing using foot patrols
Which individual is responsible for the development of the armored car used to carry money and valuables, which led to the world's largest armored car company?
a. William Burns b. Washington Perry Brinks c. William Fargo d. Henry Wells
A defendant can obtain a hearing to exclude evidence before trial that was obtained from search authorized by a search warrant, by
A. Showing an error in the warrant B. Showing the affiant made statement in reckless disregard of the truth C. Showing that the benefit of excluding the evidence is not outweighed by the costs D. Showing the affiant's falsehood by clear and convincing evidence
Which of the following is a term describing terrorism that occurs when a repressive government regime forces its citizens into obedience?
A. State-sponsored terrorism B. Lone wolf terrorism C. Criminal terrorism D. Retributive terrorism