Suppose that it would cost a firm $10 million to develop a new drug. In the absence of a patent, other firms will be able to copy and bring to market a generic equivalent of the drug in three years. In each of these three years, the firm would earn monopoly profits of $3 million. A patent will generate monopoly status for the firm for twenty years. If the government knew this information ahead of time, which of the following is most correct?
A. The government should not grant a patent to the firm, because the firm would earn monopoly profits for three years even without the patent.
B. The government should not grant a patent to the firm, because monopoly leads to efficiency losses relative to the competitive market.
C. The government should grant a patent to the firm, because even with a patent the firm will not earn a monopoly profits.
D. The government should grant a patent to the firm, because the firm would not produce the drug at all without a patent.
Answer: D
You might also like to view...
A decrease in the price of crude oil would most likely ________.
A. increase aggregate demand in the U.S. B. decrease aggregate demand in the U.S. C. decrease aggregate supply in the U.S. D. increase aggregate supply in the U.S.
A temporary price differential in resource markets is
a. eliminated by resource movements b. caused by a failure of firms to maximize profits c. eliminated by resources moving from highly-valued uses to lower-valued uses d. caused by Congress increasing the federal minimum wage e. a result of firms using the MRP = MRC rule in hiring resources
Briefly explain how a natural monopoly arises
Explain the practice of tying and discuss why it is controversial