The point of the example with the very large and very small dominoes is to:
A. prove that invisible things exist.
B. challenge the consciousness objection.
C. show that our perception that we act freely doesn't prove that we in fact do so.
D. prove that we act freely.
E. None of the above
Answer: C
You might also like to view...
Assume that the premise(s) of the following argument are true
Apply the other three tests of the worthiness of an argument in their proper order: "It is March tenth and already this year six people have ordered new glasses with plastic frames. Last year only four people had ordered plastic frames by this date. That's an increase of 50 percent. We had better stock up. It's going to be a busy year." That argument is an example of ________. (a) a fallacy masquerading as a valid inference (b) a fallacy masquerading as a warranted inference (c) a fallacy of relevance (d) a circular argument (e) an argument that is worthy of acceptance, if the premises were in fact true
Which of the following statements is not true of the Tao?
a) It is the ultimate source of all life. b) It is referred to as a formless form. c) It was created by God. d) It is like a bottomless bowl.
Socrates never used irony
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which is true of Jurgen Habermas?
What will be an ideal response?