Identify the most common pitfall in experimental research, and why it is such a detriment to experimental research.
What will be an ideal response?
A strong answer will identify claims of causality, where there are no criteria present to support the claims. The researcher failed to consider threats to internal validity. This leads to a poor experiment outcome, which contributes to weakening research as a whole.
You might also like to view...
According to the text, in some rare cases, judges may override a jury finding of guilty if they conclude that:
a. the jury is acting on a class bias b. the jury has misunderstood the evidence c. the jury has been influenced by media surrounding the case d. the jury is trying to make a statement against similar cases that were treated too lightly in the past
Which of the following best describes the true meaning of ‘jihad’?
a. The struggles of some Muslims to wage holy war against the infidel b. The internal spiritual struggle waged within oneself to become a better Muslim c. Waging warfare in defense of Islam d. A and B e. B and C
Complex criminal investigations, such as white collar crimes or major drug cases, are well suited for the inductive reasoning process.
a. true b. false
Greg's accident victim is out of the hospital and wants to talk about why he is allowed to cause so much pain, why he hasn't gotten help for his drinking and how he can move forward. What does she really want to accomplish?
a. Restorative justice b. Having a say in Greg's punishment c. Making Greg feel guilty d. Getting Greg help