INSTRUCTIONS: Select the conclusion that follows in a single step from the given premises. Throughout this test, write your answer on the form provided. Erasure marks may cause the grading machine to mark your answer wrong. Given the following premises: 1 . K ? ?H 2 . (K ? ?H) ? (B ? J) 3 . J ? D
A) H ? K 1, Impl
B) B ? D 2, 3, HS
C) K 1, Simp
D) D ? J 3, Trans
E) B ? J 1, 2, MP
E
You might also like to view...
Come up with your own example to illustrate conflicting duties as a criticism against Kant's categorical imperative test. Can you see how this problem might also be illustrated by Holme's dilemma in Abandon Ship! when he sees the storm coming? Explain.
What will be an ideal response?
Assess the following as probably true, as probably false, as requiring further documentation before judgment, or as a claim that cannot properly be evaluated. Consider both the nature of the claim and the source."My cat has fewer brains than a hubcap!"-Spoken by one of the authors of the text after his cat had spent three days on his housetop
What will be an ideal response?
The pluralist view of religions is the view that
A) no religion offers a valid path to salvation B) ?some religions offer valid paths to salvation C) ?some religions do not offer valid paths to salvation D) ?all religions offer valid paths to salvation
Some argue that performance enhancing drugs should be prohibited because they may
cause harm to the athletes who use them. Robert Simon a. maintains that ultimately that is the best grounds for prohibiting the use of performance enhancing drugs. b. rejects that argument as too paternalistic. c. argues that there is no proof that such drugs harm the user. d. believes that is a good reason to ban the use of performance enhancing drugs, but not the strongest reason. e. maintains that the benefits outweigh the harms.