How can the Us vs. Them heuristic result in a decision that may not be ethical?
What will be an ideal response
The Us vs. Them heuristic can mislead us into treating others as if they were not due to the same level of respect or did not have the same rights we have. We see this is how some people react when their fellow citizens commit an act of terrorism. They want due process and legal rights put aside so that the accused terrorist will be treated as less than an equal under the law.
You might also like to view...
Because legal standards, like "beyond a reasonable doubt," call for an unbiased, informed, and fair-minded reasoned judgment, rather than a precise mathematical calculation, critical thinking skills and all the positive habits of mind are essential fo
applying the legal standards well. Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Descartes wrote in secretive, opaque language
indicate whethet this statement is true or false
Engels held that the state is abolished
indicate whethet this statement is true or false
"It is not the case that the Conservative Party is indifferent to the plight of the homeless. Therefore, the Conservative Party cares about the homeless" commits the fallacy of
A) begging the question B) begging the question against C) complex question D) false alternatives E) accident