In A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States (1935), the justices held that ______.
A. although federal regulation of the Schechters’ poultry business was constitutionally permissible, the federal poultry codes were the product of an unconstitutional delegation of power to the executive branch
B. although the federal poultry codes were constitutionally valid, their application to the Schechters’ poultry business was constitutionally invalid because the Schechters were operating in intrastate commerce
C. the federal regulation of food products for safety and cleanliness was constitutionally permissible, but the poultry codes as drafted were unconstitutionally vague
D. the federal poultry codes were the result of an improper delegation of legislative power to the executive branch, and the regulation of the Schechters’ poultry business was an unconstitutional infringement on the state’s right to regulate intrastate commerce
D. the federal poultry codes were the result of an improper delegation of legislative power to the executive branch, and the regulation of the Schechters’ poultry business was an unconstitutional infringement on the state’s right to regulate intrastate commerce
You might also like to view...
Workplace violence is a term commonly used to describe any violence upon a person in the workplace
a. True b. False
A major concern of community policing is to convince middle management that community policing will:
A) reduce crime B) please the public C) be a permanent part of departmental policy D) control crime
The purpose of sentencing a person under the ISL is:
A) Punishment. B) Vindication. C) Rehabilitation. D) Retribution.
An example of a chemical weapon attack is:
A) Industrial chlorine containers in IED attacks in Iraq B) Sarin gas Tokyo subway attacks C) Bombing of Marine Barracks in Iraq D) Both A and B