Compare System-1 and System-2 thinking approaches to human decision making and discuss the conflict of the two systems
What will be an ideal response
System-1 processing appears highly reactive, like a reflex automatically triggered by a stimulus. It is the rapid-fire decision making we all experience on some occasions. By contrast, System-2 reasoning is much more analytical, mindful, and meta-cognitive. It is the more reflective decision making we all experience on other occasions. System-1 functions in the background, or "behind the scenes" more than System-2, but each system is capable of overriding the other. Although colloquial expressions cannot be accepted as scientifically accurate, they reveal the behind-the-scenes pushes and pulls of the two systems. Some theorists suggest that, in certain kinds of ambiguous or complex situations, the two systems might conflict, drawing the decision maker in different directions. In general, this is thought to be an advantage that reduces the chance of making poor, suboptimal, or even dangerous errors in judgment—a natural system of checks and balances, as it were.
You might also like to view...
How many covenants are concluded within the Old Testament?
A. three B. four C. five D. six
Which of the following is an example of what Aristotle called a universal?
What will be an ideal response?
In whose famous treatise, The Republic, was it suggested that it was acceptable to kill "defective" infants during the time of city-states?
a. Aristotle b. Ovid c. Plato d. Aquinas
Throughout this test, write your answer on the form provided. Erasure marks may cause the grading machine to mark your answer wrong. INSTRUCTIONS: The following selections relate to distinguishing arguments from nonarguments and identifying conclusions. Select the best answer for each. The parallel concepts of the element and the atom constitute the very foundations of chemical science. An
element is a substance that cannot be broken down into a simpler form capable of an independent existence as observable matter. As such, the concept of the element is a macroscopic one that relates to the world that we can observe with our senses. The atom is the microscopic realization of this concept. That is, it is the actual physical particle that is unique to each chemical element. Stephen Lower, Chem 1 Virtual Textbook A) Nonargument. B) Argument; conclusion: The parallel concepts ... foundations of chemical science. C) Argument; conclusion: As such, the concept of the element ... realization of this concept. D) Argument; conclusion: It is the actual physical particle ... each chemical element. E) Argument; conclusion: An element is a substance ... as observable matter.