Fracking and the Keystone Pipeline are two controversial components in the debate over environmental policy. What are these things are why are they so controversial?
What will be an ideal response?
Fracking: The technology used to extract the gas, hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” has become highly controversial. It involves injecting a chemical cocktail into the ground to break up rock and extract oil or gas. Environmental groups contend the potential threat to contaminating groundwater isn’t worth the risk. Some also worry it would emit more of the greenhouse gases blamed for global warming than the coal and oil it is intended to replace.
The Keystone Pipeline: The Keystone XL Pipeline became one of the most volatile environmental controversies of 2012. The pipeline is a 1,700-mile, $7 billion project that would bring 700,000 barrels of carbon-heavy tar sands oil per day from Alberta, Canada, to refineries on the U.S. Gulf Coast. It is very controversial due to the cost involved and the environmental impact it may have. Proponents of renewable energy argue that funds should be used to invest in renewable sources, not oil.
You might also like to view...
The British constitutional principle that parliament is sovereign means that no parliament can change a law of a previous parliament
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
Decisions about unincorporated areas of counties are made by _____
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
“Countries always have few parties WHEN THEY EMPLOY MAJORITARIAN ELECTORAL RULES.” Are the conditions shown in capital letters sufficient or necessary to produce the effects described?
A. Sufficient B. Necessary
Identify the three principal actors that compose an iron triangle.
What will be an ideal response?