Compare and contrast the Court's interpretations and treatments of symbolic and commercial speech.
What will be an ideal response?
The Supreme Court has developed different positions with regard to symbolic speech, which is nonverbal speech in the form of an action, and commercial speech, which it defines as commercial statements that describe or market products and services. The Court has traditionally protected symbolic speech through decisions such as Tinker v. Des Moines, while it extended far less support to commercial speech. However, the Supreme Court revised its previous rulings in the 2010 case Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission, which legalized corporate election contributions as free speech.
You might also like to view...
Only one of the fifty states has a unicameral legislature
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The case of the Sami reindeer herders showed that snowmobiles proved a problem because they
a. are expensive and hard to repair. b. pollute a fragile environment. c. disrupted the breeding cycle of reindeer. d. increased inequality in the community. e. All of the above are correct.
As a result of the women's rights movement, women have achieved true equality with men
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
Lack of citizen interest in, and participation in, local politics is often referred to as ________
A. gerrymandering B. grassroots apathy C. elitism D. disillusionment E. rational abstention