"Dawn" is a song included in the sound track of "eDay," a movie produced and distributed by FasTrac Corporation. The song features a digital sampling of a few seconds of the guitar solo of one of George Harrison's copyrighted sound recordings without permission. Does this digital sampling constitute copyright infringement on the part of FasTrac? Explain
Yes, the digital sampling described in this question most likely would be held to constitute copyright infringement. To transfer materially digitally, online or otherwise, it must be "copied.". So, generally, whenever a party downloads music or other software into a computer's random access memory, or RAM, without authorization, a copyright is infringed. In other words, technology has vastly increased the potential for copyright infringement. Thus, digitally sampling a copyrighted sound recording of any length constitutes copyright infringement.
In this question, a few seconds of the guitar solo of one of George Harrison's copyrighted sound recordings has been digitally sampled without permission in "Dawn.". This song is then included in the film "eDay," which is produced and distributed by FasTrac. The sampling involved "copying" the solo digitally into a computer. This constitutes copyright infringement.
You might also like to view...
Slashes can mean many things, including __________________
a. without b. reference to follow c. or d. where
If a multi-product company simply wants to know the overall breakeven point, it is easiest to use the breakeven in sales revenue approach
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following phrases explains the term lease?
A) an interest in real property given to a lender as security for the repayment of a loan B) an interest in real property for a person's lifetime C) the transfer of the right to use real property for a specified period of time D) a right to use someone else's land without owning or hiring it
Which of the following can be raised as a defense to a claim of defamation?
a. That the Internet service provider was publishing information originating from a third party. b. That there was a constitutional privilege to comment about the plaintiff who is a public figure and that the statement was made without malice. c. That there was a conditional privilege to publish a defamatory statement in order to protect a legitimate self-interest. d. All of these.