Which of the following cases sets the standard for consent searches?
a. Carroll v. United States
b. Chimel v. California
c. Mapp v. Ohio
d. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
d
You might also like to view...
The hearsay rule permits only those statements, which are offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted
a. True b. False
The guidelines that govern the conduct of all parties to a court case are called ______ ___ ____________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. All circumstantial evidence is real evidence. 2. All direct evidence is in the form of eyewitness testimony. 3. A dead body is always corpus delicti evidence that a murder occurred. 4. A lay witness provides special knowledge about a fact of the case that needs examination. 5. Physicians, therapists, and forensic science technicians can all be possible expert witnesses
An officer stops a person travelling in their car based on reasonable suspicion. The officer requests that the person step out of the vehicle and the person complies. The officer immediately notices a tattoo on the arm of the person that is common among members of a particular gang in the area known to engage in violence toward officers, thus giving the officer reasonable suspicion to believe the
person may be armed. The officer has not secured the person. At this point the officer is legally permitted to: a. frisk the person, but cannot search any part of the vehicle. b. frisk the person and search the entire car for weapons. c. frisk the person and search any part of the passenger compartment where a weapon could be kept. d. frisk the person and search any part of the passenger compartment or locked trunk where a weapon could be kept.