Here is an argument with an unstated premise or conclusion. Translate it into a standard-form syllogism and determine whether the reasoning is valid.It seems like everyone who goes to lots of movies loves Julia Roberts; I guess Becky must go to lots of movies.
What will be an ideal response?
All people who go to lots of movies are Julia Roberts fans; [Becky is a Julia Roberts fan]; therefore, Becky is a person who goes to lots of movies. Invalid.
You might also like to view...
The constructive aim of philosophy is to try to put together powerful objections to the arguments of others
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
For Socrates, it was important to engage with others
indicate whether this statement is true or false
Shinto practices can be found in Japanese homes as evidenced by the presence of a
a. kami-dana. b. butsudan. c. shomen. d. portrait of the emperor
Syllogism 4C Given the following syllogism: A boy is uncontrollable unless he has good parenting. Thus, only the choirboys are controllable, since the only boys with good parenting are choirboys. For Syllogism 4C, the major premise is:
A) All controllable boys are boys with good parenting. B) All controllable boys are choirboys. C) All choirboys are controllable boys. D) All boys with good parenting are choirboys. E) All choirboys are boys with good parenting.