Defend or refute the proposal that assisting a patient with euthanasia is compatible with the health specialist's patient advocacy duties
Euthanasia can be argued from both a utilitarian orientation as a form of compassion for one who has intractable pain or terminal illness, or from a duty orientation as honoring personal autonomy. It can be argued against on the basis of utilitarianism, in that it appears to remove barriers set up to protect ourselves from ourselves as in the slippery slope argument, or from a duty position where it is God's determination when a person should die, not man's.
You might also like to view...
People with damage to the SMA have difficulties with
a. Motivation for motor planning b. Bimanual coordination c. Using sensory information for movement d. Forming a goal-directed movement plan
Which of the following is NOT an example of poor housekeeping?
A. Accumulations of trash or litter B. Contaminated rags in open waste containers C. Leaving food unattended on a stove during cooking D. Rubbish stacked along fence lines or behind structures
Which of the following is not appropriate when talking with an elderly patient?
A. Go along with the patient's misconceptions about his or her condition. B. Look directly at the patient and speak clearly and loudly without shouting. C. Pay attention to the patient's verbal and nonverbal cues. D. Never talk down to the elderly patient.
Which would create an ethical concern?
A) Altering statistics to meet accreditation requirements. B) Documenting late entries as such in a patient's record. C) Revealing conflicts of interests to hospital administration. D) Televising press conferences at the health care facility.