Rundles, Kreiger, and Larson formed a partnership to breed and show horses. Rundles and Kreiger each contributed $25,000 to the partnership. Larson contributed four (4 ) horses valued at $25,000. The partnership agreement provided that the partners
would share profits equally. When the horses failed to perform as expected, Rundles and Kreiger decided to reduce Larson's share of the profits. Larson claims that this decision must be unanimous to be binding. How will the case be decided?
Judgment will be for Larson. Although a decision by the majority of the partners in a partnership will control in matters concerning the ordinary operations of the firm business, such a decision is not binding if it contravenes the partnership agreement. In this case, the agreement provided that the partners would share profits equally. The decision by Rundles and Kreiger is therefore not effective, since is not based on the unanimous consent of all partners.
You might also like to view...
You should never participate in mock interviews while preparing for an interview
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Arguably the most effective union organizing tactic is:
A. To send pamphlets and brochures to employees' homes. B. To have a union organizer take the lead in talking with employees about unionizing. C. To run marketing campaigns similar to those used in product marketing. D. To develop personal relationships with existing workers and train them to take the lead in talking with their co-workers about unionizing.
How has today’s technology affected our attention span for listening?
What will be an ideal response?
Developing integrated marketing communications is more difficult when different firms in the channel handle different aspects of the promotion effort.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)