Distinguish the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning. How is the skill of critical thinking linked to this analysis?
What will be an ideal response?
After an initial evaluation of evidence in a case, the criminal investigator draws conclusions through a process of reasoning. This process is typically achieved through inductive or deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning is sometimes called inductive logic; it is reasoning that takes us beyond what we know (our current evidence or information) to conclusions about what we don't know. Deductive reasoning is reasoning based on specific pieces of evidence to establish proof that a suspect is guilty of an offense. Using inductive and deductive reasoning allows officers and investigators to anticipate possible scenarios surrounding an event, and this allows the officer or investigator to gather evidence to support the case or consider evidence that may exonerate innocent parties.
You might also like to view...
Evidence cannot be shipped through the mail
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
___________ mobsters are equipped with high-quality automatic weapons thought to be obtained from factories and military installations
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
The now-clear money can be used for investments, political campaign donations,and the infiltraiton of legitimate enterprise is referred to as ______.
a. placement b. layering c. integration d. distribution
Offenses defined by public health laws that impose criminal penalties are generally "strict liability" offenses
Indicate whether the statement is true or false