Briefly describe Lau v. Nichols, its argument, and the court ruling.
What will be an ideal response?
Ans: Answers to this question will vary but should include elements of the following: Lau v. Nichols is a Supreme Court case brought forward on behalf of Chinese American students living in San Francisco. The plaintiffs argued that ELLs were receiving an inferior education, thereby violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that bans discrimination based on race, color, or national origin. In 1974, the Supreme Court ruled in the students’ favor guaranteeing the rights of English language learning students.
You might also like to view...
Which memory strategy is Morgan using when she breaks the material to be learned in her Music class into manageable chunks and conducts several short study sessions over several weeks?
A. Mnemonic device B. Overlearning C. Strategy instruction D. Distributed practice
Which of the following types of achievement test scores is considered the least precise?
a. Raw score b. Percentile score c. Stanine d. Grade equivalent score
Natural or constructed parts of the environment that give children physical limits regarding play
What will be an ideal response?
Two students take the same test and both receive a poor grade. One student thought his poor performance indicated that he must not be very smart. The other student thought her poor performance indicated that the test was too hard. This is an example of the students' differences in:
a. self-efficacy b. attribution c. law of effect d. learning by interest