Why should leaders exercise caution when reading members' evaluations of the group?
What will be an ideal response?
Leaders should read members feedback about the group with the caveat in mind that members may give inaccurate feedback for a couple of different reasons. For instance, a member may not like the leader and may give overly negative feedback. Or, on the contrary, a member may be trying to please the leader or feel concerned for the leader and give only positive feedback. So, all group evaluations should be taken into consideration to inform practice, but also be read cautiously.
You might also like to view...
__________ are tightly controlled experiments designed to test a particular intervention
a. Clinical efficacy studies b. Controlled efficacy studies c. Consultative efficacy studies d. None of the above.
The informed consent is required to contain information about the therapeutic process that would reasonably be expected to affect clients’ decisions to enter therapy with the psychologist. This information is called ________ of the therapy.
a. nature b. description c. details d. process
In the U.S., African American men have a lower life expectancy than African American women.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
According to Hulse-Killackcy, Schumacher, and Kraus, the "balance" between content and process is
a. inevitable b. ideal c. irrelevant d. impossible