Compare and contrast the actus reus and mens rea for accomplice and accessory to a crime
What will be an ideal response?
The actus reus and mens rea for accomplice and accessory liability are distinct. When discussing accomplice, the actus reus for accomplice liability is, at its most basic level, assistance. That is, a person who assists a principal in the commission of a crime has satisfied the actus reus of accomplice or accessory liability. There are three means by which assistance is typically provided: (1) assistance by physical conduct; (2) assistance by psychological influence;
and (3) assistance by omission (assuming in this latter case that the omitter has a duty to act)
You might also like to view...
In 1846, Henry David Thoreau refused to pay six years of delinquent taxes in opposition to the Mexican-American War and slavery. Thoreau was engaging in
A) moral conformism. B) anarchal passivity. C) civil disobedience. D) moral righteousness.
Which of the following are branches of government?
a. Federal b. State c. Judicial d. All of the above
___________________ is associated with distortions in auditory and visual perception, decreased activity, overestimation of time and place, and increased food consumption
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
A pardon will not erase the criminal record of an offender
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false