Murray appeared in court as a witness for his friend Maureen who was charged with driving while intoxicated. Murray testified that Maureen was not the driver of the vehicle when in fact he knew that she was. Despite Murray's testimony, Maureen friend was convicted. Given these facts, which of the following statements is true?
a. Murray has committed perjury.
b. Murray cannot be charged with perjury because his testimony was not material to the case.
c. Murray cannot be charged with perjury because he was entitled to use immunity under the Federal Constitution.
d. Murray cannot be charged with any offense because, despite his false testimony, his friend was found guilty.
A
You might also like to view...
Hursthouse (1999) argues that virtue ethics can provide ______.
a. affirmations b. action guidance c. justifications d. rules and guidelines
Which of the following statements is the MOST TRUE?
A) The challenge to improving aftercare is much easier today. B) Low recidivism rates have inspired experimentation. C) The most widely used program provides intensive supervision to low-risk youthful offenders. D) Juveniles released from training schools are even less prepared for community living than they were in the past.
Regardless of the motive or intent, there are justifications for police officers to break the law or use unethical methods to enforce it.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Which rule was established by the Chimel case (1969)?
A) The totality of the circumstances may be considered in establishing probable cause to arrest. B) After making an arrest, police may search the defendant and the area within the defendant's immediate control. C) The cardboard box "home" of a homeless person may not be searched without his or her permission. D) The room of an overnight guest may not be searched without the guest's consent, even if the homeowner has allowed police to enter and search.