How are justices appointed to the court? What are some pros and cons of each approach?
What will be an ideal response?
Answer:
A. How justices appointed (pg. 183-190): through election, appointment, or merit
B. Election Pros: people can choose the judge they want; wealthy voters cannot control elections
Election Con: Elections become very political: has involvement of political parties and other groups; judges make decisions to get re-elected
Appointment Pro: may result in more qualified choice;
Appointment Con: still very political; wealthy or elite may be able to control the appointment
Merit Pro: may result in more qualified choice; less political than other options
Merit Con: still a political process
You might also like to view...
A person must be present for a structure to be occupied
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Many activities that are unethical are also illegal. Select two technology crimes that are illegal, then click Done.
Political viability is a criterion associated with which of the following standards of an effective evaluation?
a. accuracy b. propriety c. feasibility d. utility
Training for emergency situations shall include fire, emergency, evacuation and location and use of equipment.
a) True b) False