What is the debate regarding life-sustaining care?
What will be an ideal response?
A recent debate in the United States revolves around the personal, moral, and financial costs of keeping people alive who have terminal illnesses. One question is whether one should treat the secondary conditions of people with terminal illnesses. On the one hand, people argue that these treatments could be costly, that the individual is going to die anyway, and that needlessly prolonging life is a burden on society. On the other hand, it is argued that all methods should be used, whether for a premature infant or an older person, to keep them alive despite the high cost and potential negative side effects of intervention or treatment. These individuals argue that all life is precious and that humans should not "play God" and decide when life should end. There is no question, however, that extraordinary interventions are expensive. The biggest challenge is deciding when to treat or not to treat a person with a disease.
You might also like to view...
According to ________, deviance gives the nondeviants a sense of solidarity by reasserting the importance of the rule being violated
a. order theorists b. conflict theorists c. labeling theorists d. systemic theorists
The two types of white-collar deviance are corporate deviance and occupational deviance
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
A gender gap in pay occurs in
a. the West exclusively. b. all industrialized nations. c. the East exclusively. d. some but not all industrialized nations.
While the salaries of highly skilled workers and professionals have continued to rise, the wages of less skilled workers have increased when controlled for inflation.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)