Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1.Under Terry v. Ohio, reasonable suspicion is enough for an officer to conduct a pat-down search.
2.Reasonable cause for a stop and frisk may be based upon information supplied by police informants.
3.Federal courts upheld the New York Police Department stop-and-frisk tactics, even though they have been criticized as racial profiling.
4.If police would have found the evidence with or without a warrant, even illegally obtained evidence can be used in court.
5.No warrant is needed to search a person’s trash.
1.true
2.true
3.false
4.true
5.true
You might also like to view...
An example of an argumentative question that is objectionable by the opposing attorney is:
A. "Do you still drink a six-pack of beer before going to work?" B. "What did you observe when you arrived at the scene on the night in question?" C. "Have you been called as a witness to testify in similar cases?" D. "How long have you been an officer of this police department?"
Which type of evidence would not be presented by the defense attorney?
A. Real evidence B. Alibi evidence C. Contrary evidence D. Affirmative defense E. ?Testimony
In regard to the Uniform Crime Reports, the three areas of concern for validity and reliability issues are law enforcement, reporting practices, and _____________________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
The most important item when dealing with evidence is to ensure a proper ___________________________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word