How does the protection against compulsory self-incrimination for an accused differ from the protection against compulsory self-incrimination for a witness?
What will be an ideal response?
The protection against compulsory self-incrimination for an accused is the privilege
not to testify during the defendant's criminal trial. The protection against compulsory
self-incrimination for a witness is for any witness, other than an accused on the
witness stand, who has the privilege to refuse to disclose any information that may
tend to incriminate him or her. The privilege for the accused is about testifying at all,
where the privilege for the witness is about testifying about certain facts.
You might also like to view...
Despite the further development of minority rights that occurred in the Civil Rights Era, there are remnant disenfranchisements that still greatly impact the courts system
a. True b. False
For stress discussions, Type A personalities tend to over commit themselves to a wide variety of tasks and feel that they have to be doing something all the time
A) True B) False
______ in corrections occurs when services are provided by or whole correctional institutions are operated by private businesses or corporations.
a. Privatization b. A corrections industrial complex c. Penal harm d. Penal help
Specialty courts are lower courts that have jurisdiction over one specific area of criminal activity, such as illegal drugs or domestic violence
Indicate whether the statement is true or false