Two friends wanted to decide where to go for dinner
Their conversation went like this: "We need to get something to eat. How about Sharky's so we can watch the game on TV? No, Sharky's is too noisy. Ok, how about we get pizza at the Pie Hub? The Hub is great with me." In that conversation the statement "The Hub is great with me" would be analyzed and mapped as __________.
(a) a counterargument
(b) the chosen alternative
(c) a rejected alternative
(d) a reason
(e) a recognition of the need to decide
b
You might also like to view...
As they try and fit into a work world dominated by white men, women and minorities can be disadvantaged by
a. false preconceptions. b. stereotypes. c. prejudiced attitudes. d. all of these can be a disadvantage
Epicurus was an Athenian citizen
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Syllogism 1D Given the following syllogism: All unrewarding occupations are unsatisfying jobs, because no meaningless employments are satisfying jobs and all meaningful employments are rewarding occupations. For Syllogism 1D, the minor premise is:
A) All satisfying jobs are meaningful employments. B) All satisfying jobs are rewarding occupations. C) No meaningful employments are unrewarding occupations. D) No satisfying jobs are meaningless employments. E) All meaningful employments are rewarding occupations.
Kant felt that ____was unreliable and uncertain
A. Reason B. Sentiment C. Truth D. Love