We believe that we know universal statements such as "Every action has an equal and opposite reaction." Why do rationalists think that such statements imply we have innate ideas?
What will be an ideal response?
The problem is, how do we get from what we know through individual perceptions such as "If I push this domino over, the next one falls too," to universal statements, such as "Every action has an equal and opposite reaction"? The rationalists insist that it is only by way of some innate ideas or rational intuitions that this is possible—and that the most necessary truths about the world (the statements of mathematics) could not possibly be based on experience but must be based on innate ideas.
You might also like to view...
Wittgenstein fought in World War One
indicate whether this statement is true or false
INSTRUCTIONS: Select the answer that best characterizes each immediate inference. Adopt the Aristotelian standpoint for these problems. Some term papers are not literary successes. Therefore, no term papers are literary successes
A) Invalid, illicit contrary. B) Invalid, illicit subalternation. C) Valid, no fallacy D) Invalid, illicit contraposition. E) Invalid, existential fallacy.
What policy did the Persian Empire follow in terms of local governance?
A. tight central control through satraps, or governors B. military rule through martial law C. co-option of local elites D. widespread local autonomy
Rather than strong work ethic, a more commonly seen role is:
a. Me - first b. Happy days are here to stay c. I like it easy d. Let the boss sweat it