Explain how Roche's in-the-money Bull Spread put options with a strike price of SFr 7,000 were equivalent to fixed interest-earning securities
Why might investors be more interested in owning securities with put options than owning interest-earning securities having identical rates of return? Why might the Swiss government object to the issuance of securities with in-the-money put options?
The put options gave investors the right, but not the obligation, to sell 100 warrants and receive SFr 7,000 . Because each warrant was worth SFr 66.21, the value of 100 warrants
at inception was SFr 6,621 . Roche was guaranteeing investors at least a minimum return of SFr 379, which is equal to a 1.9% annual internal rate of return (IRR) for three years.
The benefit of earning warrant-related returns is that they are often classified as capital gains and taxed at a rate lower than the rates on ordinary income. Because they reduced Switzerland's tax base, the Swiss government cracked down on put options that guaranteed such returns.
You might also like to view...
The first step in the OE/S process is typically a data flow from a(n) ______________________________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Explain how to compute dividend yield and discuss how it is used in analysis of a company's financial condition.
What will be an ideal response?
Competition-based pricing:
a. has not been used since 1967 b. is very popular today c. is a violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act d. is used exclusively by gasoline retailers e. is illegal at the local level
If a country exerts nationalization over a company's assets provides compensation, __________ has occurred
a. expropriation b. privatization c. extraterritoriality d. confiscation