Discuss symbolic interactionism as it pertains to poverty and inequality. What are some of the applications of symbolic interactionism to social policy? How does this relate to the policy implications of the general functional perspective?

Question

What will be an ideal response?

Answer 1

Symbolic interactionism evolved from Mead's hypothesis that meanings of social events emerge from the interactions among individuals, who are actors rather than reactors. Individuals learn norms and traditions through the interaction process as well as beliefs and values. As such, culture and collective consciousness are learned through the interaction process. One of the most significant applications of interactionism to poverty and inequality is the culture of poverty thesis proposed by Lewis (1969). This ideology suggests that individuals are poor because not only do they lack resources but also because they hold a unique set of values that make it difficult for them to escape poverty. Also, unlike the general functional perspective, applications of symbolic interactionism to social policy include not only welfare but also programs such as SNAP and Medicaid. Among legislators there are common themes, including personal responsibility, getting something for nothing, out-of-wedlock births, and fraud when discussing public services. There is also the notion that only poor individuals who are deserving should receive assistance and that welfare can create a cycle of dependency.