Did Brooke violate confidentiality by telling her husband what she told him? If so, does it matter that everything she told him is likely to come out in the news account anyway? Would it matter if she wouldn’t have used Frank’s name?
What will be an ideal response?
Technically, she did, even if we naturally presume that spouses share work information with each other. The duty of confidentiality covers all client information, and there is no spouseexception for breaching the duty. It really doesn’t matter that what Brooke told her husband is likely to be reported in the news, since public information is covered by the duty of confidentiality. Not using the client’s name is better than using it, provided that a nameless client can’t be identified from what was disclosed, which is pretty unlikely here.
You might also like to view...
Why is it important that the systems professionals who design a project not perform the detailed feasibility study of the project?
Each trust has which of the following?
a. Executor. b. Corpus. c. Testator. d. All of these.
Aggregate planning, to be effective, requires inputs from
A) all customers. B) all departments. C) all suppliers. D) throughout the supply chain.
Barney took what he liked to call "the shotgun approach" to forecasting. Every period he tried a number of different forecasting approaches and at the end of the period he reviewed all of the forecasts to see which was the most accurate
The winner would be used for next period's forecast (but he still made forecasts all possible ways so he could use the system again for the following period). The more formal name for this technique is: A) combination forecasting. B) post-hoc forecasting. C) focus forecasting. D) shotgun forecasting. He is using the correct terminology.