The city of East Cleveland had a municipal ordinance that regulated who could live together as a family in a single-family dwelling unit. Inez Moore, an elderly grandmother, was convicted of violating the ordinance because she had two grandsons who were cousins living in the same house with her, and that living arrangement could not be considered a single family under the definition of family in
the ordinance. She appealed her conviction on constitutional grounds. Which of the following statements is true?
a. As long as the ordinance was properly passed by the appropriate legislative body in East Cleveland, the judiciary cannot review her conviction.
b. The city's restrictive definition of family may violate Mrs. Moore's substantive due process rights.
c. Any rights of the individual with respect to family matters are not expressly included in the Bill of Rights and, as a result, cannot be made a part of due process.
d. Such a narrow definition of family is made mandatory under federal statutory law, the primary legislation that regulates family matters.
B
You might also like to view...
Federal law does not require that employers give any paid leave to employees with a new baby
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Smith v. Allwight (1994) was the first vase in which the Supreme Court upheld the voting rights of _____________ in state primary elections.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution provides in part that no state shall “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without the due process of law,” nor
a. “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” b. “establish a religion.” c. “deprive any citizen of the right to free speech on account of that citizen’s former status as a slave.” d. “remove any citizen from the armed forces based on that citizen’s race or religion.”
Which of the following is NOT a conservative
argument for why performance and achievement disparities between different ethnic and racial groups still exist after the abolition of legalized discrimination? a) There are innate differences in people's abilities. b) The harm caused by previous discrimination has not ended. c) People have different work ethics. d) People value education differently