People who claim there is no real disagreement over moral norms explain their view by saying:

A. no universally valid moral principles exist.
B. no one has the right to judge another person.

C. the disagreement is over the facts of the case only.
D. morality is a matter of personal choice.

E. None of the above


Answer: C

Philosophy & Belief

You might also like to view...

According to W. D. Ross's theory

a. a prima facie obligation is absolute and can never be overridden. b. what we should do in any specific set of circumstances will always be self-evident. c. it would be wrong to lie to a murderer even to save the life of a friend. d. we have various moral duties that can't be reduced to a single, overarching obligation

Philosophy & Belief

Theories takes common manifestations or entities and processes and formulates

characteristic theoretical ….

A. facts B. laws C. questions D. arguments

Philosophy & Belief

What sort of story would you be likely to tell if you viewed your life as a Bildungsroman?

What will be an ideal response?

Philosophy & Belief

Conflicts of interest arise when employees have a private interest in the outcome of a task in which they are engaged in that is possibly antagonistic to the firm's interests and substantial enough that it might affect the employee's independent

judgment on the firm's behalf. a. True b. False

Philosophy & Belief