INSTRUCTIONS: Select the correct answer for each multiple choice question. Given the categorical proposition "No soccer balls are tetrahedrons." If the quality but not the quantity is changed, the resulting proposition is:
A) All soccer balls are not tetrahedrons.
B) All soccer balls are tetrahedrons.
C) Some soccer balls are tetrahedrons.
D) Some soccer balls are not tetrahedrons.
E) All tetrahedrons are soccer balls.
B
You might also like to view...
Throughout this test, write your answer on the form provided. Erasure marks may cause the grading machine to mark your answer wrong. INSTRUCTIONS: The following selections relate to distinguishing arguments from nonarguments and identifying conclusions. Select the best answer for each. Most partnerships have difficulty attracting substantial amounts of capital. This is generally not a problem for
a slow growing business. But if a business's products or services really catch on, the difficulty in attracting capital becomes a real drawback. For these reasons, many growth companies, which begin life as a proprietorship or partnership, at some point find it necessary to convert to a corporation. Eugene F. Brigham, Financial Management: Theory and Practice A) Argument; conclusion: This is generally not a problem ... business. B) Nonargument. C) Argument; conclusion: But if a business's products ... becomes a real drawback. D) Argument; conclusion: Many growth companies ... to convert to a corporation. E) Argument; conclusion: Most partnerships have difficulty ... amounts of capital.
Brenkert argues that all consumers possess market competence
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Consider the following argument: "My opponent in this election doesn't deserve your vote. He's a liar, a confessed tax cheat, and twice been convicted of spying for Albania." Which of the following fallacies has been committed in this argument?
A. the fallacy of attacking the motive B. There is no fallacy committed in this argument C. the fallacy of personal attack D. the fallacy of look who's talking
Giving at least one reason for your choice, discuss whose opinion on the foreign policy of the current administration is more credible.a. a Ph.D. in political science whose specialty is U.S. foreign policyb. the chairman of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee
What will be an ideal response?