Caleb is driving a car in which Dona is a passenger when an accident occurs. Caleb and Dona are emotionally rattled, but neither is physically hurt. Caleb is not liable to Dona on a negligence theory because
A. both parties were emotionally rattled.
B. Caleb did not apparently intend to cause an accident.
C. Dona must have been comparatively negligent.
D. Dona was not injured.
Answer: D
You might also like to view...
The researcher can bias the scales by either biasing the wording of the statements (Likert type scales), the scale descriptors, or other aspects of the scale
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Divide the following word into syllables: inseparable
A) ins ep ar a ble B) in sep ara ble C) in sep ar a ble D) in se par able
Give an account of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) in business law
What will be an ideal response?
Barnes & Noble bookstores have computers available for associates to use to search for books requested by customers and to place special orders. These computers are an example of
A. line extensions. B. instrumental support. C. employee incentives. D. emotional support. E. the delivery gap.