An emerging ADA issue is obesity
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
TRUE
You might also like to view...
Poor communication can:
a. Damage a case b. Destroy a client relationship c. Harm a legal professional's reputation d. All of these choices are correct
MATCHING:
1. Assault 2. Simple Assault 3. Aggravated Assault 4. Arson 5. Hate Crimes 6. Hate Speech 7. Abduction a. An act of force or threat of force intended to inflict harm upon a person. b. The illegal carrying away of a person by force or coercion, generally with the intent to do harm to the victim. c. Using the threat of force to intimidate or threaten a person in the exercise of that person’s rights because of that person’s race, color, religions, ancestry, national origin, disability, gender, or sexual orientation. d. The willful or malicious burning or attempt to burn a building. e. A physical attack where the victim suffers no obvious injuries and the attacker does not have a weapon. f. Offenses motivated by hatred against a victim based on his or her race, religion, sexual orientation, handicap, ethnicity, or national origin. g. An attack made with the intent of inflicting severe bodily injury.
Explain what the “limited conceptualization” of g means, and the implications it has for applicants and HR managers.
What will be an ideal response?
Owner's very friendly pet Schnauzer, Bo had a habit of jumping up and playfully scratching the legs of younger children. One time Bo caused some serious scratching to a child's leg also causing the child to fall and be injured. In the parents' strict liability suit against the owner, the likely result is:
a. Owner cannot be held strictly liable because the dangerous propensity of Bo was not a vicious one. b. Owner can be held strictly liable because he knew of this dangerous propensity of Bo even though the dog was not vicious. c. Owner cannot be held strictly liable because Bo did not bite the child. d. None of the above.