Lexical definitions are designed to show how words are commonly used
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
true
You might also like to view...
Considering the context in which it was most likely uttered, would you say the following claim is ambiguous, too vague, or neither?"... and my house is on the right-hand side of the street."
What will be an ideal response?
Translate the following statement into symbols, using the schemes of abbreviation provided: It's not the case that Sally is in love with James, though James is in love with Sally. (S: Sally is in love with James; J: James is in love with Sally.)
Symbols list You may use the list below to copy-and-paste the symbols into your answer as needed. ?; ?; •; ~; ?; ?
The principle of universalizability does not account for the immorality of
a. principled fanatics. b. slavery. c. lying. d. cheating on one's taxes.
You have two choices: job A and job B. Considering how much you'll enjoy the job, how much money you'll make, and how much you'll improve the world—indeed, everything you care about—you consider various outcomes for each job. If you take job A, there's a 20% chance that things will go well. If you take job B, there's a 60% chance that things will go well. The outcome where things go well with job A has twice as much utility as the outcome where things go well with job B, which in turn has twice as much utility as things not going well (in either job). Which job has greater expected utility, and by how much? (Remember that you can use the arbitrary measurement of utils to work this out—just keep the proportions as specified.)
A. They have the same expected utility B. Job B has twice as much utility as Job A C. Job B has more utility than Job A but less than twice as much D. Job A has slightly more utility than Job B.